Prove AML training
actually happened.
Poor AML training records — no evidence of ongoing or role-specific training — are a recurring SRA finding. Reglo keeps training, attestations, comprehension tests, and reminders organised, so you can show who was trained, on what, and whether they understood it.
An attendance list is not training evidence. Can you show ongoing, role-specific training — and that staff understood it?
The SRA frequently finds poor AML training records, a lack of evidence of ongoing or role-specific training, and gaps between documented procedures and how staff actually work. Inspections test whether fee earners understand and apply AML processes consistently. Reglo keeps the proof — completion, comprehension, and acknowledgement — connected to the policies it relates to.
Who this is for
For everyone responsible for AML training evidence
MLROs and MLCOs
Evidence ongoing, role-specific AML training across the firm — not a once-a-year tick box.
COLPs and compliance leads
Show who is trained, who is outstanding, and that training maps to current policies.
Practice and HR managers
Automated reminders and records instead of chasing completion by email.
How Reglo helps
From regulatory change to audit-ready
Assign role-specific training
Target AML training to the right roles and departments — and link each to the policy or obligation it relates to.
Test understanding, capture sign-off
Comprehension tests and timestamped attestations prove staff didn't just attend — they understood and acknowledged.
Reminders and records, automatically
Automated reminders chase outstanding training; completion and comprehension are recorded and ready to export.
What you get
What strong AML training evidence looks like
Ongoing, role-specific, understood — and provable.
Who, what, and when
A record of who completed which training, when, and the policy or obligation it related to.
Role-specific coverage
Training targeted by role and department — evidence of more than a single firm-wide session.
Evidence of understanding
Comprehension tests show staff understood the material, not just that they attended.
Reminders that close gaps
Automated follow-ups for outstanding or overdue training — so coverage stays complete.
Common gaps firms discover too late
Why training records fall short
Attendance, not understanding
A sign-in sheet with no evidence anyone understood or applied the training.
One-size-fits-all
A single firm-wide session with no role-specific training for higher-risk teams.
Policy/practice gap
Procedures documented, but staff unclear how to apply them in real matters.
Evidence Reglo helps you keep ready
The AML training record an SRA review expects
- Completion records: who was trained, when, and on what
- Role-specific training mapped to roles and departments
- Comprehension evidence that staff understood the material
- Attestations linking training to the relevant policy
- Outstanding and overdue training, with reminders sent
- A timestamped, exportable training history
This replaces overhead — it doesn't need a new budget line.
Chasing training completion and assembling records is recurring compliance and HR time. Reglo automates the reminders and keeps the evidence ready, removing that manual overhead.
- Hours of policy admin, attestation chasing, and evidence assembly handed back to the firm — not a new headcount.
- Typically less than the billable time firms lose to manual policy updates and audit preparation each month.
- Guided onboarding: we migrate your policies and map your sources — no IT project, no six-month rollout.
Common questions
What makes AML training records adequate for the SRA?
Evidence of ongoing and role-specific training — who completed it, when, what it related to, that they acknowledged it, and ideally that they understood it. A single annual attendance list is a common shortfall.
Does Reglo replace our AML training course?
No. Reglo organises the records, attestations, comprehension tests, and reminders around your training. You can keep your existing course or provider — Reglo keeps the evidence audit-ready.
Can Reglo show training is role-specific?
Yes. Training is assigned by role and department and linked to the relevant policy, so you can evidence that higher-risk teams received targeted AML training, not just a firm-wide session.
How does this support an MLRO interview?
The MLRO can show, from one place, that staff across the firm have completed role-specific AML training, acknowledged the relevant policies, and demonstrated understanding — exactly what inspections test for.
Related solutions
More for law firm compliance
See how Reglo would work for your firm
Book a demo and we'll show you how Reglo keeps your policies, training, attestations, and audit-ready evidence aligned — against your real compliance setup. Your team stays in control; humans approve every change.